September 2008
It is the “art” of Cultural Revolution to use words instead of guns
“Gay” Marriage and the Meaning of Words
Every educated person who knows anything about the strategy of so-called “cultural deconstruction” knows that changing the meaning of words is an essential part of the process. “Deconstruction,” by the way, is the first term used by Marxist revolutionaries to describe the process of systematically destroying or significantly altering the authority and value structures of a culture and replacing them with new ones. In other words, it is the “art” of Cultural Revolution to use words instead of guns to overthrow existing social fabrics and institutions. It works effectively if the saboteurs control meaningful access to the mass media, radical student groups, and “links” to groups within the target culture that have suffered real or perceived injustices. The other necessary ingredient for success is a “political majority” who are both unaware of the deconstructionists’ strategy and who are “too polite,” even if they discover it, to culturally fight back with equal or greater energy than the de-constructionist revolutionaries. Golly gee; do you think I could be describing modern America? In my lifetime, the gay political strategists are the best I have seen; being a student of historical revolution, that takes in some ground. Good “language strategy” is an art form, and in the last forty years or so, consider either the current ambiguities or meaning reversals of these major words: “freedom,” “tolerance,” “prejudice,” “choice,” “family,” “American,” “multi-culturalism,” “unity,” and now, “marriage.” This is just a short list - and what about the word “gay?” My Webster’s Dictionary in no place refers to it as meaning “homosexual.” These guys are good.
To change a culture, all one really has to do is pound away effectively on its dysfunctions or hypocrisies as touching its own confessed “higher values.” Then link your cause to any other causes which have already been conceded by the “offending” culture to create sufficient guilt, suppressing their ability to fight back against you. In the case of the homosexual agenda, they tied their wagon to the civil rights movement, male chauvinism, cultural prejudice, heterosexual marriage and family failures, sexual hypocrisy in church leaders, and America’s general “angst” concerning what it really believes about its current wealth and status as the world’s only “super-power.” Nicely done and really easy to do for any “high school level” political strategist. Once again, cheers for the “gay” strategists and no cheers for the vast numbers of Americans stumbling along in their guilt and confusion.
“Civil unions” for homosexuals are most likely a done deal for the foreseeable future. In an increasingly secular culture, with a large amount of confusion surrounding Christians guilty of their own immoralities, abortions, and divorces, this is a no-brainer. To yield to the homosexuals, the word “marriage” is no different than calling a “man” a “person” or a “child” an “adult,” because words mean less and less in a decaying society. Polygamy is next. We no longer have meaningful national borders and who knows what an “American” is? We have brought most of this upon ourselves. At some time, a line will be crossed on issues more germane to our nation’s survival than that of sexual orientation. It will be argued with “words” and the only question will be, “What do those words mean?” And that is...
the bottom line.
